The Singer Who Couldn’t Cry
She was trying so hard to get it right. That was exactly the problem.
She was trying so hard.
You could hear it in every phrase — the monitoring, the managing, the constant internal check. Is the breath right? Is the tone placed correctly? Is the jaw released? Every note arrived slightly late because it had been approved before it left. Every phrase was safe. Every dynamic was considered.
The voice was good, just a little weak. In fact there were moments of real beauty in it — flashes where something genuine came through before the monitoring caught up and smoothed it back down.
But the overall impression was of a singer standing just outside her own song. Watching it happen. Making sure nothing went wrong.
I let her finish. Then I asked: what were you feeling in that last verse?
She thought about it. I was thinking about my breath, she said. And whether my tongue was too far back on the high note.
And the song? I asked. What the song is actually about?
A long pause.
I was trying to get it right, she said.
***
This is one of the most common places singers get stuck — and one of the most misunderstood, because from the outside it can look like a technique problem. The voice sounds stiff, mechanical, careful. The natural response is to add more technique — more exercises, more correction, more things to monitor.
But more monitoring is exactly the wrong medicine. The voice isn’t stiff because it needs more instruction. It’s stiff because it’s carrying too many instructions already.
Here’s what I know after forty years in the studio: technique is not the destination. Technique is what you build so that you don’t have to think about it when it matters most. The breath work, the resonance, the register transitions — all of that has to be practiced and rehearsed and internalized deeply enough that during a performance it runs quietly in the background, like an engine you trust. You’ve done the work. The body knows. Now you can put your attention somewhere else.
Where? On the music. On the feeling. On the actual human experience the song is asking you to enter.
That’s the other ball in the air. And it’s the one that makes people stop breathing in the audience.
***
But here’s what I’ve found underneath the careful singing, almost every time.
The hyper-vigilance around technique is rarely only about technique.
When I work with a singer who is monitoring every note, who can’t let a phrase go without checking it first, who is singing as though one wrong move might break something — I start asking a different set of questions. Not about the breath. About what’s underneath the breath.
Because what I see, more often than not, is a singer who is hiding.
The careful singing is a mask. A very convincing one — it looks like diligence, like professionalism, like respect for the craft. And it is all of those things. But it is also a way of staying safe. If I’m thinking about my tongue position, I don’t have to feel the thing the song is asking me to feel. If I’m managing the breath, I don’t have to let anything in that might be hard to manage.
The tears, in other words, are right there. Have been right there the whole time. The technique is the story she’s telling herself so she doesn’t have to feel them.
***
Singing asks something of us that almost nothing else does.
It asks us to feel our emotions and execute our craft at the same time. To be technically present and emotionally open simultaneously. To let what is true in the song — the grief, the longing, the joy, the fury — move through the body while the body is also doing the precise, disciplined work of producing sound.
That is not easy. It requires a particular kind of courage that has nothing to do with hitting the right notes.
It requires being brave enough to feel.
Not to perform feeling — that’s the trap, and audiences smell it instantly. But to actually allow the emotion to exist inside you while you sing. To let it seep in. To connect with your true heart, the one that knows what this song is really about, the one that has its own losses and its own longings and its own reasons for singing this particular piece on this particular night.
That connection is what moves rooms. Not the technique — the truth behind it.
***
The technique still matters. Let me be clear about that.
A voice that hasn’t done the foundational work can’t hold the emotion and the craft at the same time, because the craft requires too much conscious attention to leave room for anything else. This is why training matters. This is why the daily practice, the exercises, the slow incremental building of the instrument — all of it is in service of this moment. You practice so that the technique becomes second nature. You build it until the body trusts it. Until you can walk onto a stage and let the instrument do what it knows how to do while you do the harder, braver thing: feel.
***
Back to the singer who was trying so hard.
We worked together for a while — on the technical pieces, yes, but more on the other thing. On learning to let the song in. On sitting with the feeling a lyric carried instead of immediately moving to the next breath mark. On being willing to not know what the voice was going to do in a given moment, and staying in the emotion anyway.
One afternoon she was singing a song that had nothing technically demanding in it. Simple melody, simple range, nothing to monitor. And something opened.
She stopped mid-phrase. Not because something went wrong.
Because something went right.
There were tears on her face. Real ones. Not performed, not manufactured — arrived.
I felt that, she said. Quietly. A little stunned.
I know, I said. So did I.
That’s the voice telling the truth. That’s what we’re building toward — not the perfect phrase, but the honest one. The one that comes from somewhere real and lands somewhere real.
Your technique is the foundation. Your heart is the house.
Both have to be built. Both have to be open.
To your vocal freedom,
Cari Cole
caricole.com
Here’s the behind the scenes — what really went on. For paid subscribers…
